The worldwide authorized order loses its effectiveness when confronted with the unilateralism of hegemonic powers in addition to acts that flout universally accepted norms. If such practices stay unaddressed, there’s a danger that the order will lose its foundational goal: the safety of justice, peace, and the sovereignty of countries.
The assault by the US and Israel on Iran, together with the focused killings of scientists and intellectuals, bombing of IAEA-approved nuclear services, and strikes towards residential, medical, media, and public infrastructure, is a main instance of unlawful, unilateral motion that should not stay unaddressed. It’s a wrongful act and a transparent violation of elementary norms of worldwide legislation.
On this context, the precept of state accountability, which dictates that states are held accountable for wrongful acts, should be utilized. This precept was codified by the Worldwide Legislation Fee ILC in its 2001 Draft Articles on Accountability of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, which have since been broadly recognised and cited by worldwide courts and tribunals.
Per their provisions, the fee of a wrongful act – such because the illegal use of pressure – constitutes a violation of a global obligation and imposes a binding responsibility on the accountable state to supply full and efficient reparation for the hurt induced.
Within the case of the unlawful acts dedicated by the US and Israel, the scope of obligation goes far past unusual violations. These acts not solely contravened customary worldwide legislation, but additionally breached peremptory norms, the highest-ranking norms throughout the worldwide authorized hierarchy. Amongst these, the precept of the prohibition of aggression is a core and universally binding rule. No state is permitted to derogate from this norm, and violations set off obligations, requiring all members of the worldwide group to reply collectively to uphold the legislation.
There are at the very least two related authorized precedents that may information the applying of the precept of state accountability and the duty for reparations within the case of Iran.
In 1981, the United Nations Safety Council adopted Decision 487 in response to Israel’s assault on Iraq’s nuclear services. It unequivocally characterised this act of aggression as a “severe menace to the whole safeguard regime of the Worldwide Atomic Vitality Company [IAEA]”, which is the inspiration of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). The decision additionally totally recognised the inalienable sovereign proper of all states to determine programmes of technological and nuclear growth to develop their economic system and trade for peaceable functions.
Article 6 stipulates that “Iraq is entitled to applicable redress for the destruction it has suffered, accountability for which has been acknowledged by Israel”. By mandating that the aggressor compensate the sufferer for the ensuing damages, the decision offers a transparent authorized precedent for pursuing redress in comparable instances.
Thus, given the truth that the assaults by the US and Israel had been carried out with public declarations confirming the operations and are well-documented, the applying of the rules and provisions of Decision 487 to the Iranian case just isn’t solely applicable and mandatory but additionally firmly grounded in worldwide legislation.
One other related doc is UN Safety Council Decision 692, which was adopted in 1991 and established the United Nations Compensation Fee (UNCC) following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait. The fee was tasked with processing claims for compensation of losses and damages incurred on account of the invasion.
The creation of UNCC demonstrated the capability of worldwide mechanisms to establish victims, consider injury, and implement sensible compensation – setting a transparent mannequin for state accountability in instances of illegal aggression.
This precedent offers a powerful authorized and institutional foundation for asserting the rights of the Iranian folks. It’s subsequently each applicable and mandatory for the UN to determine a rule-based mechanism, comparable to a global fee on compensation, to redress Iran.
Such a fee, initiated and endorsed by the UN Common Meeting or different competent UN our bodies, ought to undertake a complete evaluation of the damages inflicted by the illegal and aggressive acts of the US and the Zionist regime towards Iran.
The institution of reparative mechanisms – whether or not by impartial commissions, fact-finding our bodies, or compensation funds working beneath worldwide oversight – would contribute meaningfully to restoring belief within the international authorized system and supply a principled response to the continuing normalisation of impunity.
Iran additionally has one other avenue for pursuing justice for the unlawful assaults it was subjected to. Within the lead-up to them, the IAEA revealed biased and politically motivated stories concerning the Iranian nuclear programme, which facilitated the fee of aggression by the US and Israel and breached the precept of neutrality.
This locations Iran ready to hunt redress and declare damages from the company beneath Article 17 of the IAEA Safeguards Settlement. As a state harmed by the company’s manifest negligence, Iran is entitled to full reparation for all materials and ethical damages inflicted upon its peaceable nuclear services and scientific personnel.
On this context, pursuing accountability for the IAEA, alongside the aggressor states, is an important factor of Iran’s broader technique to uphold accountability throughout the worldwide authorized order. By counting on recognised, professional, and binding worldwide mechanisms, Iran will steadfastly defend the rights of its folks at each discussion board.
Finally, accountability for the latest crimes of this struggle of aggression doesn’t lie solely with the direct perpetrators, the US and Israel, and people who aided them, the IAEA. All states and worldwide organisations bear an plain obligation to implement efficient authorized measures to stop such crimes.
The worldwide group as a complete should reply decisively. Silence, delay, or any type of complicity within the face of aggression and atrocities would cut back the precept of state accountability beneath worldwide legislation to an empty slogan.
In its pursuit of accountability, Iran will exhaust all accessible assets and won’t relent till the rights of its individuals are totally recognised and so they obtain ample redress. It’s going to proceed to hunt the prosecution and accountability of these liable for these crimes, each domestically and internationally, till justice is totally achieved.
The views expressed on this article are the writer’s personal and don’t essentially mirror Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.