On Monday, 28 international locations, together with the UK, Japan, and quite a few European nations, issued a joint assertion calling on Israel that the warfare on Gaza “should finish now”, marking the newest instance of intensifying criticism from Israel’s allies.
The joint assertion, signed by the overseas ministers of those international locations, condemned “the drip feeding of help and the inhumane killing of civilians, together with kids, in search of to satisfy their most simple wants of water and meals”.
The assertion comes as world strain mounts on Israel over civilian casualties at help websites, obstruction of humanitarian help, and violations of worldwide humanitarian legislation – because the occupied Palestinian territory simmers with hunger.
Israel’s warfare on Gaza has killed greater than 59,000 folks and wounded 140,000 for the reason that October 7, 2023 assaults by Hamas, wherein 1,139 folks had been killed and greater than 200 had been taken captive.
So, what does the joint assertion say? Who’re these international locations? And the way have Israel and its closest ally, the USA, reacted?
What did the assertion say?
The joint assertion stated the international locations are coming collectively “with a easy, pressing message: The warfare in Gaza should finish now.”
The assertion underlined that the struggling of civilians in Gaza has reached “new depths” and that the Israeli authorities’s help supply mannequin is “harmful, fuels instability and deprives Gazans of human dignity”.
They referred to as on the Israeli authorities to “adjust to its obligations below worldwide humanitarian legislation” and instantly carry restrictions on the circulation of help.
The group of nations additionally famous that the captives “cruelly held” by Hamas proceed to “endure terribly” and referred to as for his or her rapid and unconditional launch.
They stated within the assertion {that a} negotiated ceasefire presents “one of the best hope of bringing [the captives] dwelling and ending the agony of their households”.
Demographic change, settler violence: What else did the international locations say?
The international locations criticised Israel’s plan to ascertain a focus zone – Israel’s imaginative and prescient of relocating your complete Palestinian inhabitants right into a fenced, closely managed zone constructed on the ruins of Rafah – as “utterly unacceptable”.
“Everlasting pressured displacement is a violation of worldwide humanitarian legislation,” the joint assertion stated.
The group of nations additionally marked its opposition to “any steps in the direction of territorial or demographic change within the Occupied Palestinian Territories” and famous that the E1 settlement plan introduced would divide a Palestinian state in two, “marking a flagrant breach of worldwide legislation and critically [undermining] the two-state answer”.
In addition they referred to as out that the “settlement constructing throughout the West Financial institution, together with East Jerusalem, has accelerated whereas settler violence towards Palestinians has soared. This should cease.”
Which international locations signed the joint assertion?
The joint assertion was signed by the overseas ministers of a complete of 28 international locations:
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Iceland, Eire, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK.
These governments, lots of them allies of Israel, issued a few of their strongest language but, condemning the obstruction of help within the occupied Palestinian territory.

Which of these international locations recognise Palestine?
Out of those 28 international locations from the joint assertion, 9 recognise the State of Palestine as a sovereign state.
Cyprus, Malta, and Poland recognised Palestine shortly after the Palestinian Declaration of Independence in 1988.
Iceland adopted in 2011, and Sweden in 2014. Eire, Norway, Slovenia, and Spain recognised Palestine in 2024.
How did Israel reply?
Oren Marmorstein, a spokesperson for the Israel Ministry of Overseas Affairs, wrote on X that Israel rejects the joint assertion printed by the group of nations, “as it’s disconnected from actuality and sends the improper message to Hamas”.
Israel additional claimed that as a substitute of agreeing to a ceasefire, “Hamas is busy operating a marketing campaign to unfold lies about Israel” and intentionally performing to extend friction and hurt to civilians who come to obtain humanitarian help.
The assertion additional stated there’s a “concrete proposal for a ceasefire deal” and Hamas “stubbornly refuses to simply accept it”.
What does Hamas say in regards to the ceasefire?
The spokesperson of the navy wing of Hamas stated Israel was the one which rejected a ceasefire settlement to launch all captives held in Gaza.
Qassam Brigades spokesperson Abu Obeida stated in a prerecorded video, launched on Friday, that the group had in current months supplied a “complete deal” that may launch all captives directly – however it was rejected by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his far-right ministers.
“It has grow to be clear to us that the federal government of the legal Netanyahu has no actual curiosity within the captives as a result of they’re troopers,” he stated, including that Hamas favours a deal that ensures an finish to the warfare, a withdrawal of Israeli forces, and entry of humanitarian help for besieged Palestinians.
Hamas continues to be holding 50 folks in Gaza, about 20 of whom are believed to be alive.

What’s Israel blocking from getting into Gaza, claiming that Hamas can use it?
Israel continues to dam the entry of important humanitarian provides into Gaza, claiming that Hamas may divert or repurpose them for navy use.
Among the many gadgets withheld are: Child formulation, meals, water filters, and medicines.
Medication and medical provides face blocks as a part of Israel’s “dual-use” restrictions, the place gadgets like painkillers and dialysis gear are held again, ostensibly for doable Hamas exploitation in navy contexts.
Different medical gear, reminiscent of oxygen cylinders, anaesthetics, and most cancers medicines, has been restricted.
Israeli authorities argue that some gadgets, like sure chemical substances or electronics, may have dual-use potential.
Support teams report that the blanket denial of essential medical gadgets is pushing Gaza’s well being system in the direction of complete collapse, and say that these restrictions are collective punishment and violations of worldwide humanitarian legislation.