The administration of President Donald Trump has adopted by with a risk to sanction officers on the Worldwide Prison Court docket (ICC), naming 4 judges whom it accuses of taking “illegitimate and baseless actions” in opposition to the USA and its allies.
On Thursday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio introduced the sanctions in a sharply worded written assertion.
“The ICC is politicized and falsely claims unfettered discretion to analyze, cost, and prosecute nationals of the USA and our allies,” Rubio wrote.
“This harmful assertion and abuse of energy infringes upon the sovereignty and nationwide safety of the USA and our allies, together with Israel.”
The 4 sanctioned judges embrace Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza of Peru, Reine Adelaide Sophie Alapini Gansou of Benin and Beti Hohler of Slovenia.
Because of the sanctions, the judges will see their US-based property and belongings blocked. US-based entities are additionally forbidden from participating in transactions with them, together with by the “provision of funds, items or providers”.
The ICC shortly issued a press release in response, saying it stood behind its judges and “deplores” the Trump administration’s resolution.
“These measures are a transparent try and undermine the independence of a global judicial establishment which operates beneath the mandate from 125 States Events from all corners of the globe,” the assertion mentioned.
“Concentrating on these working for accountability does nothing to assist civilians trapped in battle. It solely emboldens those that imagine they will act with impunity.”
Who’re the judges?
In a reality sheet, the State Division defined that Bossa and Ibanez Carranza had been sanctioned for authorising an investigation into US troops in Afghanistan in 2020, throughout Trump’s first time period as president.
Beforehand, the ICC had blocked a request to probe alleged battle crimes and crimes in opposition to humanity in Afghanistan, the place the US had been main a slow-grinding battle from 2001 to 2021.
But it surely reversed course the next yr, granting a prosecutor’s request to analyze US forces and members of the Central Intelligence Company (CIA) for battle crimes in “secret detention amenities” in Afghanistan and elsewhere.
Afghanistan, the courtroom famous, was a member of the Rome Statute, which incorporates the 125 nations the place the ICC has jurisdiction.
However the Trump administration on the time blasted the courtroom’s resolution, calling the ICC a “political establishment masquerading as a authorized physique”. It has lengthy argued that the US, which isn’t occasion to the Rome Statute, lies outdoors the ICC’s jurisdiction.
One other nation that isn’t a member of the Rome Statute is Israel, which has used comparable arguments to reject the ICC’s energy over its actions in Palestine.
The second pair of judges named in Thursday’s sanctions — Alapini Gansou and Hohler — had been sanctioned for his or her actions in opposition to Israeli leaders, in response to the US State Division.
The US is Israel’s oldest ally, having been the primary to recognise the nation in 1948. It has since supplied Israel sturdy help, together with for its ongoing battle in Gaza, which has killed an estimated 54,607 Palestinians to date.
Consultants on the United Nations and human rights organisations have in contrast Israel’s navy marketing campaign in Gaza to a genocide, as studies proceed to emerge of alleged human rights abuses.
In November 2024, these accusations spurred the ICC to challenge arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, who’ve each been accused of battle crimes in Gaza, together with intentional assaults on civilians.
Alapini Gansou and Hohler reportedly took half in these proceedings.
Has this occurred earlier than?
This isn’t the primary time that the US has issued restrictions in opposition to an ICC official since Trump returned to workplace for a second time period on January 20.
Shortly after taking workplace, Trump issued a broad govt order threatening anybody who participates in ICC investigations with sanctions. Critics warned that such sweeping language might pervert the course of justice, for instance by dissuading witnesses from coming ahead with proof.
However Trump argued that the latest arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant necessitated such measures.
He additionally claimed that the US and Israel had been “thriving democracies” that “strictly adhere to the legal guidelines of battle” and that the ICC’s investigations threatened navy members with “harassment, abuse and potential arrest”.
“This malign conduct in flip threatens to infringe upon the sovereignty of the USA and undermines the crucial nationwide safety and international coverage work of the USA Authorities and our allies, together with Israel,” the manager order mentioned.
Beneath that order, the US sanctioned ICC prosecutor Karim Khan, who had petitioned the courtroom for the arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant. That, in flip, slowed the investigation into Israel’s actions in Gaza, and Khan later stepped away from his function amid allegations of sexual misconduct.
However Trump has a historical past of opposing the ICC, stretching again to his first time period. In 2019, as an example, Trump introduced his administration would deny or yank visas for ICC officers concerned in investigating US troops in Afghanistan.
Then, in 2020, he sanctioned ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda and a courtroom official named Phakiso Mochochoko for his or her involvement within the investigation. These actions had been later overturned beneath President Joe Biden.
Critics, nonetheless, warn that Trump’s actions might have dire penalties over the long run for the ICC, which depends on its member nations to execute orders like arrest warrants. The courtroom itself has referred to as for an finish to the threats.